Skip to main content

Fundamental Attribution Error

One day I was waiting in the lift lobby at work, having nothing to do. It was one of those days where frustration was sky-high, everything that could go wrong did. So, I took a break! Software engineers reading this would agree with me. Might seem silly for others though. Coming back to the story. There in the ground floor lift lobby, I noticed a guy, who was in his mid-30s or so he looked like. We entered the lift.  He punched in floor 1. What a lazy ass! I have noticed him repeating this couple other times. I thought he must really be a sloth. I made fun of him. I loud-mouthed once to my teammates that I am going to take the stairs for four floors and beat them to it. The one-floor guy was around waiting for the lift in the lobby. I made sure he heard it loud and clear. 

A few months later, I joined the gym to bulk up. My romance with the gym as you guessed didn’t last long. But oh boy I didn’t give up so easily. I persisted for two months you see! The fifth day of my first week turned out to be legs day. I came out a chicken after the session. My legs seemed to sway in a different direction. Unfortunately, my gym was on the first floor. There was no lift service either. So, I had to walk down the stairs. Every inch of my muscle hurt. I couldn’t even think about climbing the stairs.

That very same day there was a meeting scheduled. But it was on the floor above mine. I thought I should take the lift and hoped that one-floor guy should be nowhere when I do this. But has anything ever gone my way? No! He was there with a laptop in his hand and, we entered the lift. We entered the lift. He pressed the button for floor six. I didn’t punch in any. He seemed confused and looked at me. We both went one floor up. And exited the lift. That guy gave me a smile. I was so hurt but returned a sheepish smile. But why did I do that? I was at the gym. I exercised my muscles. I earned it. Unlike him, I was not lazy!

"We judge others by their actions, and ourselves by our intentions" - Stephen Covey

Then something hit me. Was I unfair to that one-floor lift guy? Could he be facing some problems that made him act so? Indeed, I was rude to him. I judged him based on his action and ascribed it to his personality. I didn't consider the situation that may have influenced him to do so.  Turns out this phenomenon has a name– Fundamental Attribution Error. We tend to over-emphasize personality-based explanations for behaviours observed in others while under-emphasizing situation.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Shaktimaan and the French Philosopher

My childhood superhero was Shaktimaan. I persuaded my parents to buy me Shaktimaan dress for my 6th birthday. I succeeded in getting the dashing outfit. But the transformation isn’t complete without red colour gloves, socks and shoes. I threw tantrums but my parents got the better of me. I was the Shaktimaan who showed up in paragon slippers. Sorry, Shaktimaan! Shaktimaan, the Indian Superhero  Fast forward to the present. I buy the complete set for my niece as her birthday gift every year. She doesn't get only a doll from me. She gets all the accessories that go with it. Wand, tiara, makeup kit and what not! I remember the first time I bought a formal suit. I ended up buying cufflinks, tie, watch, belt and other such accessories. I am sure you would have experienced such things too. You buy a new phone. You follow it up buying a cover, earphones, screen guard, etc. One buy leads to another. And this has a name – Diderot Effect . Named after Denis Diderot,  an 18th-century French p

Elixir for hair growth

In the late 1950s, a pharmaceutical manufacturing company Upjohn developed minoxidil to treat ulcers. However, during clinical trials on dogs, the medication did not cure ulcers. And they were disappointed. Instead, they found that medication had widened the blood vessels. An unexpected effect they didn’t foresee. Bingo! They had found medicine to treat high blood pressure. Upjohn patented the drug and the FDA approved its usage to treat high blood pressure in 1979. The drug was sold in oral tablet form with the trade name Loniten . Surprise, Surprise! The story doesn’t end there. While the FDA granted Upjohn permission to test the drug as medicine for hypertension, scientists noticed some of the patients were reporting unexpected hair growth. One of the patients, a woman, complained that she had to shave her legs and trim her hair more frequently than before she started taking the medicine. Even though researchers thought the effect of the drug on hair growth is more unlikely, they d